commit 316a31e704c97c1f83f0066cd7cd517dcab23255 Author: pragmaticplay6009 Date: Mon Jan 13 09:31:40 2025 +0800 Add 'Five Killer Quora Answers On Pragmatickr' diff --git a/Five-Killer-Quora-Answers-On-Pragmatickr.md b/Five-Killer-Quora-Answers-On-Pragmatickr.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..300592a --- /dev/null +++ b/Five-Killer-Quora-Answers-On-Pragmatickr.md @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +Pragmatics and Semantics + +Many modern philosophical perspectives are based on semantics. Brandom, for example, focuses on the meaning of words (albeit from a pragmatic point of view). + +Others take a more comprehensive perspective on pragmatics, such as relevance theory, which attempts to understand the processes of an utterance by a hearer. This approach tends to ignore other aspects of pragmatics, like epistemic discussions on truth. + +What is pragmatism, exactly? + +Pragmatism is a philosophical approach that offers a viable alternative to continental philosophy and analytic philosophy. Charles Sanders Peirce conceived the concept, and William James extended it. Later, Josiah Royce developed the philosophy. It had a profound effect on the fields of inquiry from philosophy of theology to philosophy of science, but also on ethics, politics and philosophy of language. The pragmatist tradition continues develop. + +The pragmatic principle is at the heart of classical pragmatics. It is a principle that clarifies the meaning of hypotheses by examining their 'practical implications', or their implications for the experience of particular situations. This creates a distinct epistemological perspective that is a form of 'inquiry epistemology based on inquiry' and an anti Cartesian explanation of the rules that govern inquiry. The early pragmatists were divided on whether pragmatism was a science-based philosophy that adopted a monism regarding truth (following Peirce) or a broad alethic pluralitism (James & \ No newline at end of file